Effects of Incorrect Computer-aided Detection (CAD) Output on Human Decision-making in Mammography

Eugenio Alberdi, PhD, Andrey Povyakalo, PhD, Lorenzo Strigini, MEng, Peter Ayton, PhD

[recipient of the 2005 Herbert M. Stauffer Award for the "Best Clinical Paper" from the Association of University Radiologists]

Rationale and Objectives. To investigate the effects of incorrect computer output on the reliability of the decisions of
human users. This work followed an independent UK clinical trial that evaluated the impact of computer-aided detection
(CAD) in breast screening. The aim was to use data from this trial to feed into probabilistic models (similar to those used
in “reliability engineering”) which would detect and assess possible ways of improving the human–CAD interaction. Some
analyses required extra data; therefore, two supplementary studies were conducted. Study 1 was designed to elucidate the
effects of computer failure on human performance. Study 2 was conducted to clarify unexpected findings from Study 1.

Materials and Methods. In Study 1, 20 film readers viewed 60 sets of mammograms (30 of which contained cancer) and
provided “recall/no recall” decisions for each case. Computer output for each case was available to the participants. The
test set was designed to contain an unusually large proportion (50%) of cancers for which CAD had generated incorrect
output. In Study 2, 19 different readers viewed the same set of cases in similar conditions except that computer output
was not available.

Results. The average sensitivity of readers in Study 1 (with CAD) was significantly lower than the average sensitivity of readers
in Study 2 (without CAD). The difference was most marked for cancers for which CAD failed to provide correct prompting.

Conclusion. Possible automation bias effects in CAD use deserve further study because they may degrade human decision-
making for some categories of cases under certain conditions. This possibility should be taken into account in the
assessment and design of CAD tools.

Key Words. Computer-aided detection (CAD); mammography; evaluation; reliability.

Acad Radiol 2004; 11:909–918